Download PDF
In relief 1(a) and (b), the claimant asked for payment of his salaries whether as a subsisting staff or as a staff whose employment has been determined. By LUTH & MB v. Adewole [1998] 5 NWLR (Pt. 550) 406, where the claim is that payment of salaries has been wrongfully withheld, the cause of action accrues from the date the salaries are due for payment; and the liability of the employer does not generally depend on demand for payment. Going by this authority, the cause of action in this matter arose in February 2005. In relief 1(a), the claimant is asking for payment of his salaries from February 2005 till judgment is obtained. For a cause of action that arose in February 2005, having to file this suit on 26th February 2013 means that this case was filed 8 years after the cause of action arose. The Lagos State Limitation Law Cap. L67 Laws of Lagos State 2003 in section 8 provides for a limitation period of 6 years for actions such as the instant case to be brought to Court. In relief 3, the claimant is asking for N5,000,000 damages for untold hardship and torture occasioned by the defendant’s breach of contract. Relief 2 is for a declaration that the purported indefinite suspension of the claimant by the defendant is wrongful, unlawful, in breach of the right to fair hearing, in breach of contract, null, void and of no effect whatsoever. The argument of the claimant in this respect that the letter of his suspension indicated that the defendant will communicate to him, which it did not, changes nothing; likewise the argument of the claimant as to the two letters written by his solicitor to the defendant. This is because time still runs despite intervening acts. On the whole, I find and hold that this case is statute-barred. It is accordingly struck out. Ruling is entered accordingly. I make no order as to cost. …………………………………… Hon. Justice B. B. Kanyip